The tragic death of Chicago rapper FBG Duck (Carlton Weekly) in August 2020 shook the music world and exposed the violent undertones of ongoing gang conflicts within Chicago’s hip-hop scene. While the physical violence culminated in the fatal shooting of FBG Duck, the aftermath has taken a legal turn as a detailed lawsuit has emerged, attempting to hold multiple parties accountable, including high-profile rappers like Lil Durk and King Von (posthumously), as well as major record labels and the City of Chicago.
FBG Duck’s mother, Lashina Weekly, has filed a comprehensive 229-page lawsuit, which lays out the tragic events surrounding her son’s death and the role she believes various individuals and entities played in his killing. This blog post will examine the key elements of this lawsuit, break down the legal allegations, and explore the implications for the parties involved, particularly focusing on the legal responsibilities and potential consequences that arise from the case. We’ll also discuss the gang-related context of the lawsuit, the claims of profit-driven misconduct, and the alleged negligence of emergency services in the City of Chicago.
The Background: FBG Duck’s Killing in 2020
Carlton Weekly, widely known by his rap name FBG Duck, was killed on August 4, 2020, in broad daylight outside a Dolce & Gabbana store in Chicago’s upscale Gold Coast neighborhood. FBG Duck was a prominent figure in Chicago’s drill music scene, a genre known for its raw lyrics about street life and gang violence. Weekly’s death followed years of violent feuding between rival gangs associated with Chicago’s drill music artists. He was reportedly part of the Flyboy Gang, while Lil Durk and King Von were alleged to have ties to the Only The Family (OTF) gang. Both sides had exchanged violent threats and insults in their music, particularly through “diss tracks.”
While Weekly’s death may have appeared to be another tragic incident in Chicago’s ongoing gang violence, his mother’s lawsuit paints a far more complex picture. The suit argues that the murder was not only the result of personal animosity between gang members but was exacerbated and exploited by music companies and record labels for financial gain.
The Lawsuit: Key Allegations
1. Targeting Lil Durk, King Von, and Music Labels
The lawsuit names Lil Durk, the estate of the late King Von, and several major music companies as defendants. According to the suit, these entities allegedly played a direct role in FBG Duck’s death by profiting off and perpetuating gang violence. The term “profit” is mentioned 102 times in the lawsuit, highlighting the central theme that corporate interests fueled the violence between the gangs for financial gain.
FBG Duck’s mother argues that record labels, including Sony Music, Interscope Records, and Alamo Records, signed artists based on their involvement in gangs, pushing them to create music that glorified violence and escalated feuds. The complaint suggests that these companies knew about the dangerous gang affiliations of their signed artists but chose to support and promote them because it increased the profitability of their music. By incentivizing this kind of behavior, the lawsuit claims, the music labels were complicit in FBG Duck’s murder.
2. Gang Feuds and Diss Tracks
The legal filing emphasizes the role of diss tracks as a tool to escalate violence between rival gangs. FBG Duck, Lil Durk, and King Von were central figures in the feud between Flyboy Gang and Only The Family (OTF). Diss tracks between the groups gained widespread popularity in the Chicago drill music scene, with each artist gaining notoriety as the feud intensified. According to the lawsuit, the record labels saw the financial potential in these diss tracks and promoted the music because the rivalry between the gangs attracted more attention, resulting in higher sales and streaming numbers.
The lawsuit even includes visual evidence, such as an album cover released by OTF, Alamo Records, and Sony Music in 2019, as proof that the labels directly supported artists who were involved in gang violence. Lawyers for FBG Duck’s mother argue that this organized promotion of violent music not only profited from gang feuds but also helped sustain and encourage the violence that ultimately led to her son’s death.
3. Organized Crime Allegations
One of the more shocking aspects of the lawsuit is its portrayal of the music labels and the rappers as participants in organized criminal activity. The lawsuit goes as far as to suggest that the relationships between the artists and the music companies mirrored those of organized crime syndicates, where artists were signed to music deals based on their rank within the gang.
This organized nature, as depicted in the lawsuit, portrays the record labels as acting with full knowledge of the dangers their artists were involved in. The complaint notes that numerous individuals signed to these labels were allegedly involved in violent criminal activities and that the labels knowingly provided financial backing to further these illegal endeavors.
4. The Role of the City of Chicago: Negligence and Misconduct
In addition to targeting the music labels and artists, the lawsuit also accuses the City of Chicago and its emergency services of willful misconduct. FBG Duck was left lying in the street for more than 17 minutes after being shot, during which time he received no medical assistance. The lawsuit claims that the failure of police and emergency services to promptly help FBG Duck amounted to negligence, potentially contributing to his death.
The legal argument here centers on the idea that law enforcement and medical personnel delayed their response because of Weekly’s alleged gang affiliation. The lawsuit argues that this neglect on the part of emergency services represents willful misconduct, further compounding the already tragic loss of life.
5. Seeking Justice for FBG Duck and His Family
At the heart of the lawsuit is a mother’s fight for justice for her son. Lashina Weekly has been vocal about her son deserving better treatment—not only from the people who took his life but also from the broader community, including the music industry and the authorities. She contends that the lawsuit is not just about money but about holding those responsible accountable for their role in her son’s death.
FBG Duck left behind children, and his mother has expressed that they too deserve justice. The lawsuit makes it clear that the financial windfall generated by gang violence in the music industry cannot go unchecked and that those who profit from this violence must answer for their actions.
Legal Grounds: Misconduct, Negligence, and Civil Liability
Misconduct and Negligence in Tort Law
The lawsuit rests on two primary legal claims: misconduct and negligence. Both of these claims are rooted in tort law, which deals with civil wrongs that result in harm or injury to another party.
- Misconduct refers to improper or unlawful behavior by a party that results in harm to another. In this case, the plaintiff argues that the record labels and music companies engaged in willful misconduct by supporting and profiting from gang violence, knowing full well the dangers involved.
- Negligence occurs when a party fails to exercise the level of care that a reasonable person would in a similar situation, resulting in harm. The plaintiff’s claim against the City of Chicago alleges that police and emergency services were negligent in failing to provide timely assistance to FBG Duck, ultimately contributing to his death.
Civil Conspiracy and Profit-Driven Violence
A major theme in the lawsuit is the allegation of civil conspiracy. This legal theory holds that multiple parties can be held liable for working together to commit a wrongful act. Here, the lawsuit accuses the record labels, artists, and other associated entities of conspiring to promote violence between gangs for profit.
The repeated use of the word “profit” in the lawsuit underscores the claim that the violence wasn’t accidental or isolated but was part of a calculated strategy to increase the popularity and profitability of the artists. By associating with gang members and promoting violent music, the lawsuit argues that the companies helped create an environment that fostered gang feuds, which directly contributed to FBG Duck’s death.
Implications of the Lawsuit
If successful, this lawsuit could have far-reaching consequences for the music industry. Record labels have long been accused of promoting harmful behavior for profit, but this lawsuit directly links such behavior to violent crime and death. A judgment in favor of FBG Duck’s family would set a precedent, opening the door for more lawsuits against companies that profit from violent or dangerous content.
Moreover, the lawsuit highlights the complex relationship between the music industry and the communities that its artists represent. Drill music, with its roots in the struggles of Chicago’s urban neighborhoods, has long been both celebrated and criticized for its portrayal of violence. This lawsuit forces the question: to what extent should the industry be held accountable for the real-world consequences of the violent content it promotes?
———————————————
The lawsuit filed by Lashina Weekly in response to the 2020 killing of her son, FBG Duck, is a significant legal battle that touches on numerous areas of law, including negligence, misconduct, civil conspiracy, and the ethics of profit-driven violence. The accusations against Lil Durk, King Von’s estate, and multiple music labels present a critical challenge to the music industry’s role in perpetuating gang-related violence.
This case could set a powerful legal precedent, reshaping the way the music industry approaches the promotion of violent content and gang-affiliated artists. As the lawsuit progresses, it will no doubt be closely watched by both the legal and music communities, as it highlights the darker side of entertainment and the tragic consequences that can arise when profit is prioritized over human life. FBG Duck’s family continues to seek justice for his death, and this lawsuit serves as a critical step in holding those responsible accountable.
